Max Bayroff Corp. v. Showplace Bowling Center, Inc.

187 A.D.2d 269, 590 N.Y.S.2d 410, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12588
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 5, 1992·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Walter Schackman, J.), entered on or about April 8, 1992, which granted the petition to confirm an arbitrator’s award, and granted petitioner judgment against respondent, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Parties may appropriately place the issue of jurisdiction before the arbitrator (Matter of Kelley [Bauer], 240 NY 74, 79), and the merits of the arbitrator’s determination are subject only to limited judicial review (Integrated Sales v Maxell Corp., 94 AD2d 221). In any event, respondent did not timely move to stay arbitration and thus waived the issue of jurisdiction (see, CPLR 7503; Matter of Sussco Exterior Sys. v Hercules Constr. Corp., 120 AD2d 532, 533, lv denied 68 NY2d 610). Concur—Carro, J. P., Ellerin, Kupferman, Kassal and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Max Bayroff Corp. v. Showplace Bowling Center, Inc., 187 A.D.2d 269, 590 N.Y.S.2d 410, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12588 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

187 A.D.2d 269 (Max Bayroff Corp. v. Showplace Bowling Center, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stone v. Noble Construction Management, Inc.
116 A.D.3d 838 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Bevona v. Valencia
191 A.D.2d 192 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)