Max Andrew Soto v. the State of Texas
This text of Max Andrew Soto v. the State of Texas (Max Andrew Soto v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
No. 07-22-00356-CR
MAX ANDREW SOTO, APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
On Appeal from the County Court Hale County, Texas Trial Court No. 2021C-463, Honorable David B. Mull, Presiding
May 22, 2023 ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND Before PARKER and DOSS and YARBROUGH, JJ.
Appellant, Max Andrew Soto, appeals his conviction for unlawful carrying of a
weapon.1 Appellant’s brief was originally due April 13, 2023, but was not filed. By letter
of April 27, 2023, we admonished Appellant’s appointed counsel that failure to file a brief
by May 8 would result in the appeal being abated and the cause remanded to the trial
1 See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 46.02. court for further proceedings. Appellant’s counsel has not filed a brief or had any further
communication with this Court to date.
We, therefore, abate the appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for further
proceedings. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(2), (3). Upon remand, the trial court shall
determine the following:
(1) whether Appellant still desires to prosecute the appeal;
(2) whether Appellant is indigent;
(3) why a timely appellate brief has not been filed on behalf of Appellant;
(4) whether Appellant’s counsel has abandoned the appeal;
(5) whether Appellant has been denied the effective assistance of counsel;
(6) whether new counsel should be appointed; and
(7) if appellant desires to continue the appeal, the date the Court may expect
Appellant’s brief to be filed.
The trial court is also directed to enter such orders necessary to address the
aforementioned questions. So too shall it include its findings on those matters in a
supplemental record and cause that record to be filed with this Court by June 21, 2023.
If it is determined that Appellant desires to proceed with the appeal, is indigent, and has
been denied the effective assistance of counsel, the trial court may appoint new counsel;
the name, address, email address, phone number, and state bar number of any newly
appointed counsel shall be included in the aforementioned findings.
Should counsel file a brief on or before June 5, 2023, he is directed to immediately
notify the trial court of the filing, in writing, whereupon the trial court shall not be required
to take any further action.
2 It is so ordered.
Per Curiam
Do not publish.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Max Andrew Soto v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/max-andrew-soto-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2023.