Mawthe v. Alexander Crozier & Co.

50 Tex. 153
Texas Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1878·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Moore, Chief Justice.

Upon the face of this transcript, the District Court evidently had neither original nor appellate jurisdiction of this case. "We may unquestionably imagine a state of facts which would have warranted its transfer from the County Court to the District Court; but to justify the District Court in taking jurisdiction of it, and this court in affirming its judgment, these facts, if in truth they exist, should have been in some way incorporated into or shown by the record.

But this has not been done, and, “ as we have to act upon the record as we find it here,” we have no alternative but to “ reverse the judgment and remand the case, for want of jurisdiction of the District Court to hear and determine it,” as appears by the record presented to this court. (Lane v. Doak, 48 Tex., 227.)

Judgment reversed and cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mawthe v. Alexander Crozier & Co., 50 Tex. 153 (Tex. 1878).

50 Tex. 153 (Mawthe v. Alexander Crozier & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Glasscock v. Barnard
125 S.W. 615 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1910)
Heidenheimer Bros. v. Marx & Kempner
1 White & W. 68 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1881)
Chrisman v. Graham
51 Tex. 454 (Texas Supreme Court, 1879)