Mawthe v. Alexander Crozier & Co.

50 Tex. 153
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1878
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 50 Tex. 153 (Mawthe v. Alexander Crozier & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mawthe v. Alexander Crozier & Co., 50 Tex. 153 (Tex. 1878).

Opinion

Moore, Chief Justice.

Upon the face of this transcript, the District Court evidently had neither original nor appellate jurisdiction of this case. "We may unquestionably imagine a state of facts which would have warranted its transfer from the County Court to the District Court; but to justify the District Court in taking jurisdiction of it, and this court in affirming its judgment, these facts, if in truth they exist, should have been in some way incorporated into or shown by the record.

But this has not been done, and, “ as we have to act upon the record as we find it here,” we have no alternative but to “ reverse the judgment and remand the case, for want of jurisdiction of the District Court to hear and determine it,” as appears by the record presented to this court. (Lane v. Doak, 48 Tex., 227.)

Judgment reversed and cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Glasscock v. Barnard
125 S.W. 615 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1910)
Heidenheimer Bros. v. Marx & Kempner
1 White & W. 68 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1881)
Chrisman v. Graham
51 Tex. 454 (Texas Supreme Court, 1879)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
50 Tex. 153, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mawthe-v-alexander-crozier-co-tex-1878.