Mawson v. Wermuth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Mawson v. Wermuth

89 N.Y.S. 1110

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 30, 1904·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Motion for leave to appeal granted, and the following question certified: Was it competent and,, proper for the respondent to allege and prove upon the trial of this proceeding, in defense thereof, that the judgment obtained by Martin Devoy against William Wermuth was assigned to Ebenezer Wermuth prior to the issuance by him of the execution under which the respondent’s real property was sold; and had the county judge jurisdiction to try that question 'and determine the validity of the execution sale thereunder?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Motion for leave to appeal granted, and the following question certified: Was it competent and,, proper for the respondent to allege and prove upon the trial of this proceeding, in defense thereof, that the judgment obtained by Martin Devoy against William Wermuth was assigned to Ebenezer Wermuth prior to the issuance by him of the execution under which the respondent’s real property was sold; and had the county judge jurisdiction to try that question 'and determine the validity of the execution sale thereunder?

Mawson v. Wermuth, 89 N.Y.S. 1110 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1904).

Pincite

89 N.Y.S. 1110 (Mawson v. Wermuth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related