M.A.W. v. State
This text of 859 So. 2d 566 (M.A.W. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
M.A.W., a child, appeals the trial court’s order finding him guilty of three counts of third-degree felony battery, but withholding the adjudication of delinquency. While the evidence of MAW.’s guilt was in conflict, the trial court’s finding of guilt is supported by competent, substantial evidence. However, we do conclude that the trial court erred in ordering M.A.W.’s family to undergo a psychological evaluation and to avoid any contact with the victims or their families.
Before a court may order sanctions against the parents or guardian of a delinquent child, a petition for parental sanctions must be served on the parents or guardian in accordance with Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.031. That was not done here. Further, such an order would be inappropriate when, as here, adjudication of delinquency is withheld. See § 985.204, Fla. Stat. (2002).1
We affirm the order under review, but remand this matter to the trial court with directions to strike that portion of the order that requires M.A.W.’s family (but not M.A.W.) to submit to a psychological evaluation and to refrain from contact with the victims or their families.
AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
859 So. 2d 566, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 17713, 2003 WL 22734805, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maw-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.