Maw v. Bonadonna
This text of 20 A.D.2d 680 (Maw v. Bonadonna) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment insofar as it is in favor of Clarence Maw in the sum of $5,400 unanimously affirmed, with costs. The judgment insofar as it awards damages to Gail Maw having been set aside and the order setting it aside not having been appealed from, that part of the judgment is not before us. (Appeal from judgment of Monroe Trial Term for plaintiffs in an automobile negligence action.) Present — Williams, P. J., Goldman, Henry and Noonan, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
20 A.D.2d 680, 246 N.Y.S.2d 1021, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4551, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maw-v-bonadonna-nyappdiv-1964.