Mavins v. State

908 S.W.2d 462, 1995 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 102, 1995 WL 623292
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided October 25, 1995·No. No. 1221-94·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinions

OPINION ON THE APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

PER CURIAM.

Appellant pled guilty to attempted capital murder and was sentenced to forty years confinement. The Court of Appeals affirmed. Mavins v. State, 886 S.W.2d 378 (Tex.App. — Houston [First] 1994). We granted appellant’s petition for discretionary review to determine whether the Court of Appeals correctly determined the trial judge did not err in overruling appellant’s motion to suppress. After careful review of the Court of Appeals’ opinion as well as the briefs and the record, we conclude our decision to grant review was improvident. See Tex.R.App.Pro. 202(k). Accordingly, the appellant’s petition for discretionary review is dismissed.

CLINTON and KELLER, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mavins v. State, 908 S.W.2d 462, 1995 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 102, 1995 WL 623292 (Tex. 1995).

908 S.W.2d 462 (Mavins v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Colson v. Grohman
24 S.W.3d 414 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2000)
Atkins v. State
984 S.W.2d 780 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1999)
State v. Consaul
982 S.W.2d 899 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1998)