Mavins v. State
This text of 908 S.W.2d 462 (Mavins v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
OPINION ON THE APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
Appellant pled guilty to attempted capital murder and was sentenced to forty years confinement. The Court of Appeals affirmed. Mavins v. State, 886 S.W.2d 378 (Tex.App. — Houston [First] 1994). We granted appellant’s petition for discretionary review to determine whether the Court of Appeals correctly determined the trial judge did not err in overruling appellant’s motion to suppress. After careful review of the Court of Appeals’ opinion as well as the briefs and the record, we conclude our decision to grant review was improvident. See Tex.R.App.Pro. 202(k). Accordingly, the appellant’s petition for discretionary review is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
908 S.W.2d 462, 1995 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 102, 1995 WL 623292, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mavins-v-state-texcrimapp-1995.