Mavins v. State
Opinions
OPINION ON THE APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
Appellant pled guilty to attempted capital murder and was sentenced to forty years confinement. The Court of Appeals affirmed. Mavins v. State, 886 S.W.2d 378 (Tex.App. — Houston [First] 1994). We granted appellant’s petition for discretionary review to determine whether the Court of Appeals correctly determined the trial judge did not err in overruling appellant’s motion to suppress. After careful review of the Court of Appeals’ opinion as well as the briefs and the record, we conclude our decision to grant review was improvident. See Tex.R.App.Pro. 202(k). Accordingly, the appellant’s petition for discretionary review is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
908 S.W.2d 462 (Mavins v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.