Maust v. Carmer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Maust v. Carmer

140 A.D.2d 1007, 529 N.Y.S.2d 718, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6207

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 27, 1988·Published

Opinion

Memorandum: The appeal has been deemed abandoned and dismissed, without the necessity of an order; thus, the motion to dismiss is unnecessary. Appellants’ request for further time to perfect the appeal is denied without prejudice to the making of a motion to vacate the abandonment and dismissal, upon a proper showing (see, 22 NYCRR 1000.3 [b] [2]). Present — Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Denman, Balio and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Memorandum: The appeal has been deemed abandoned and dismissed, without the necessity of an order; thus, the motion to dismiss is unnecessary. Appellants’ request for further time to perfect the appeal is denied without prejudice to the making of a motion to vacate the abandonment and dismissal, upon a proper showing (see, 22 NYCRR 1000.3 [b] [2]). Present — Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Denman, Balio and Lawton, JJ.

Maust v. Carmer, 140 A.D.2d 1007, 529 N.Y.S.2d 718, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6207 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

140 A.D.2d 1007 (Maust v. Carmer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.