Mauss v. Mauss

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Mauss v. Mauss

100 A.D.2d 576, 473 N.Y.S.2d 511, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17552

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 19, 1984

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 100 A.D.2d 576 (Mauss v. Mauss) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mauss v. Mauss, 100 A.D.2d 576, 473 N.Y.S.2d 511, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17552 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

In related proceedings involving a petition for custody and a petition for support, the husband appeals from (1) an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Deutsch, J.), dated November 22, 1982, which granted the wife’s petition, inter alia, for an upward modification of support, and (2) a further order of the same court, dated January 25, 1983, which, inter alia, denied his petition for custody. 1f Orders affirmed, with one bill of costs. H Appellant’s income has quadrupled since the original order of alimony and child support was set at $30 per week in 1975. Accordingly, an upward modification was more than justified by the substantial change in circumstances (see Domestic Relations Law, § 236, part A, subd 1). We have considered appellant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Niehoff, J. P., Rubin, Boyers and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In related proceedings involving a petition for custody and a petition for support, the husband appeals from (1) an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Deutsch, J.), dated November 22, 1982, which granted the wife’s petition, inter alia, for an upward modification of support, and (2) a further order of the same court, dated January 25, 1983, which, inter alia, denied his petition for custody. 1f Orders affirmed, with one bill of costs. H Appellant’s income has quadrupled since the original order of alimony and child support was set at $30 per week in 1975. Accordingly, an upward modification was more than justified by the substantial change in circumstances (see Domestic Relations Law, § 236, part A, subd 1). We have considered appellant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Niehoff, J. P., Rubin, Boyers and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

100 A.D.2d 576, 473 N.Y.S.2d 511, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17552, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mauss-v-mauss-nyappdiv-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack