Mauro v. White

75 A.D.2d 887, 429 N.Y.S.2d 883, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11527

This text of 75 A.D.2d 887 (Mauro v. White) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mauro v. White, 75 A.D.2d 887, 429 N.Y.S.2d 883, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11527 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for. personal injuries sustained in an automobile accident, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated October 1, 1979, which granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and directed an assessment of damages. Order reversed, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements, and motion denied. The existence of factual issues regarding the events immediately preceding the instant accident and conflicting inferences which may be drawn therefrom preclude the granting of summary judgment (see Ugarriza v Schmieder, 46 NY2d 471, affg 61 AD2d 1010). Mangano, J. P., Gulotta, Cohalan and Margett, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ugarriza v. Schmieder
386 N.E.2d 1324 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
Ugarriza v. Schmieder
61 A.D.2d 1010 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
75 A.D.2d 887, 429 N.Y.S.2d 883, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11527, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mauro-v-white-nyappdiv-1980.