Mauro v. White

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Mauro v. White

75 A.D.2d 887, 429 N.Y.S.2d 883, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11527

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 27, 1980·Published

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for. personal injuries sustained in an automobile accident, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated October 1, 1979, which granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and directed an assessment of damages. Order reversed, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements, and motion denied. The existence of factual issues regarding the events immediately preceding the instant accident and conflicting inferences which may be drawn therefrom preclude the granting of summary judgment (see Ugarriza v Schmieder, 46 NY2d 471, affg 61 AD2d 1010). Mangano, J. P., Gulotta, Cohalan and Margett, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a negligence action to recover damages for. personal injuries sustained in an automobile accident, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated October 1, 1979, which granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and directed an assessment of damages. Order reversed, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements, and motion denied. The existence of factual issues regarding the events immediately preceding the instant accident and conflicting inferences which may be drawn therefrom preclude the granting of summary judgment (see Ugarriza v Schmieder, 46 NY2d 471, affg 61 AD2d 1010). Mangano, J. P., Gulotta, Cohalan and Margett, JJ., concur.

Mauro v. White, 75 A.D.2d 887, 429 N.Y.S.2d 883, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11527 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

75 A.D.2d 887 (Mauro v. White) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related