Mauro v. Daniels & Kennedy, Inc.
This text of 261 A.D. 1090 (Mauro v. Daniels & Kennedy, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action brought to recover damages for personal injuries, order directing examination before trial of appellant John J. McAulliffe and another, in so far as appealed from, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, the examination to proceed on five days’ notice. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
261 A.D. 1090, 27 N.Y.S.2d 1018, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8912, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mauro-v-daniels-kennedy-inc-nyappdiv-1941.