Mauro v. Arpaio
162 F.3d 547, 1998 WL 848044
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided December 2, 1998·No. No. 97-16021·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion, Mauro v. Arpaio, No. 97-16021, slip op. at 10013 (9th Cir. Sept. 1,1998), is withdrawn.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mauro v. Arpaio, 162 F.3d 547, 1998 WL 848044 (9th Cir. 1998).
162 F.3d 547 (Mauro v. Arpaio) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Christopher Hargis v. Phil Foster, Beauchamp, Lahaei, D.W. McEcheron and D. H.O. Crawford
312 F.3d 404 (Ninth Circuit, 2002)
Christopher Hargis v. Phil Foster, Beauchamp, Lahaei, D.W. McEcheron and D.H.O. Crawford
282 F.3d 1154 (Ninth Circuit, 2002)
Jonathan D. Mauro v. Joseph M. Arpaio, Sheriff Maricopa County, a Political Subdivision of the State of Arizona
188 F.3d 1054 (Ninth Circuit, 1999)