Mauricio Balderas v. State
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-12-00793-CR
Mauricio BALDERAS, Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas, Appellee
From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2011-CR-0555 Honorable Melisa Skinner, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Luz Elena Chapa, Justice
Delivered and Filed: March 27, 2013
DISMISSED
On February 14, 2013, this court issued an order stating this appeal would be dismissed
pursuant to Rule 25.2(d) unless an amended trial court certification that shows appellant has the
right of appeal was made part of the appellate record within thirty days. See TEX. R. APP. P.
25.2(d), 37.1; see also Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174, 175–76 (Tex. App.—San Antonio
2003, order). Appellant did not file an amended certification. The clerk’s record does not
contain a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal; to the contrary, the trial
court certification in the record states “this criminal case is a plea-bargain case, and the 04-12-00793-CR
defendant has NO right of appeal.” The clerk’s record contains a written plea bargain, and the
punishment assessed did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed
to by the defendant; therefore, the clerk’s record supports the trial court’s certification that
defendant has no right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). Accordingly, we dismiss the
appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d).
DO NOT PUBLISH
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mauricio Balderas v. State (Mauricio Balderas v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.