Maurice Young v. Scott McAfee, Judge
This text of Maurice Young v. Scott McAfee, Judge (Maurice Young v. Scott McAfee, Judge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________ June 25, 2025
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A25E0142. YOUNG v. McAFEE.
Upon consideration of Petitioner Maurice Young’s “Inmate Form for Civil Actions,” which we have construed as a petition for mandamus, the same is hereby DENIED. See Ga. Const. of 1983, Art. VI, Sec. I, Par. IV; Art. VI, Sec. V, Par. III; Court of Appeals Rule 40 (c).
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 06/25/2025 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Maurice Young v. Scott McAfee, Judge, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maurice-young-v-scott-mcafee-judge-gactapp-2025.