Maurice X. Anderson v. Charles L. Wolff, Jr., Warden, Nebraska Penal and Correctional Complex

468 F.2d 252
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedOctober 10, 1972
Docket72-1378
StatusPublished

This text of 468 F.2d 252 (Maurice X. Anderson v. Charles L. Wolff, Jr., Warden, Nebraska Penal and Correctional Complex) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Maurice X. Anderson v. Charles L. Wolff, Jr., Warden, Nebraska Penal and Correctional Complex, 468 F.2d 252 (8th Cir. 1972).

Opinion

468 F.2d 252

Maurice X. ANDERSON et al., Appellants,
v.
Charles L. WOLFF, Jr., Warden, Nebraska Penal and
Correctional Complex, Appellee.

Nos. 72-1378, 72-1379.

United States Court of Appeals,
Eighth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 22, 1972.
Decided Oct. 10, 1972.

Con M. Keating, Lincoln, Neb., for appellants.

Clarence A. H. Meyer, Atty. Gen., and James J. Duggan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lincoln, Neb., for appellee.

Before LAY, ROSS and STEPHENSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This is a civil rights action by state prisoners brought under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Plaintiffs claim that their dietary laws as Black Muslims are violated by prison rules and regulations. Chief Judge Urbom denied relief. We affirm his ruling dismissing the action on the basis of his well reasoned opinion. See also, Evans v. Ciccone, 377 F.2d 4 (8 Cir. 1967).

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
468 F.2d 252, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maurice-x-anderson-v-charles-l-wolff-jr-warden-nebraska-penal-and-ca8-1972.