Maurice S. Young v. United States District Court Norman A. Carlson Edwin Meese, III Marion S. Barry Counsel, District of Columbia
This text of 842 F.2d 1293 (Maurice S. Young v. United States District Court Norman A. Carlson Edwin Meese, III Marion S. Barry Counsel, District of Columbia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
842 F.2d 1293
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Maurice S. YOUNG, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT; Norman A. Carlson; Edwin
Meese, III; Marion S. Barry; Counsel, District
of Columbia, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 87-7363.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 28, 1987.
Decided March 24, 1988.
Maurice S. Young, appellant pro se.
Before WIDENER and JAMES DICKSON PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from its order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2241 is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Young v. United States District Court, C/A No. 87-204-AM (E.D.Va. Mar. 9, 1987).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
842 F.2d 1293, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 3582, 1988 WL 25317, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maurice-s-young-v-united-states-district-court-norman-a-carlson-edwin-ca4-1988.