Maurice Rosenblatt v. United States
This text of 394 F.2d 986 (Maurice Rosenblatt v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
394 F.2d 986
Maurice ROSENBLATT, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
No. 24857.
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.
May 31, 1968.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas; Ben C. Connally, Judge.
Dougal C. Pope, Houston, Tex., for appellant.
Mitchell Rogovin, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, William A. Friedlander, Jeanine Jacobs, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., Morton L. Susman, U. S. Atty., Houston, Tex., James R. Gough, Asst. U. S. Atty., Houston, Tex., for appellee.
Before GOLDBERG and CLAYTON, Circuit Judges, and HANNAY, District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
There being no merit to this appeal, the case was, from the bench.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
394 F.2d 986, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 6702, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maurice-rosenblatt-v-united-states-ca5-1968.