Maurice Middlebrooks v. First Fleet

North Carolina Industrial Commission

Maurice Middlebrooks v. First Fleet

North Carolina Industrial Commission·Decided January 3, 2007·No. I.C. NO. 479763.·Published

Opinion

*********** The portion of Deputy Commissioner Holmes's March 20, 2006 Opinion and Award granting plaintiff a hearing de novo is hereby STRICKEN. Should a new hearing be requested, the evidence admitted before Deputy Commissioner Ledford shall be admitted into the record.

No costs are assessed to either party at this time.

This the 15^th day of November, 2006.

S/____________ BUCK LATTIMORE CHAIRMAN

CONCURRING:

S/_____________ THOMAS J. BOLCH COMMISSIONER

S/__________________ BERNADINE S. BALANCE COMMISSIONER

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*********** The portion of Deputy Commissioner Holmes's March 20, 2006 Opinion and Award granting plaintiff a hearing de novo is hereby STRICKEN. Should a new hearing be requested, the evidence admitted before Deputy Commissioner Ledford shall be admitted into the record.

No costs are assessed to either party at this time.

This the 15^th day of November, 2006.

S/____________ BUCK LATTIMORE CHAIRMAN

CONCURRING:

S/_____________ THOMAS J. BOLCH COMMISSIONER

S/__________________ BERNADINE S. BALANCE COMMISSIONER

Maurice Middlebrooks v. First Fleet, (N.C. Super. Ct. 2007).

Pincite

Maurice Middlebrooks v. First Fleet (Maurice Middlebrooks v. First Fleet) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.