Maurice Lashawn Manning v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 5, 2019·No. 19-0517·Published

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

No. 1D19-0517 _____________________________

MAURICE LASHAWN MANNING,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent. _____________________________

Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel— Original Jurisdiction.

August 5, 2019

PER CURIAM.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits.

RAY, C.J., and KELSEY and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________ Maurice Lashawn Manning, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Maurice Lashawn Manning v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Maurice Lashawn Manning v. State of Florida (Maurice Lashawn Manning v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.