Maurice J. Savoie, Lipton J. Vizier and Gerald M. Labruzzo v. United States
334 F.2d 206, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 4806
Opinion
There was ample evidence which, while circumstantial, warranted the judg *207 ment of conviction of the appellants of violations of Title 16 U.S.C.A. § 703, the Migratory Bird Act, by the trial judge in a jury-waived case. No other errors appearing on the record, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Maurice J. Savoie, Lipton J. Vizier and Gerald M. Labruzzo v. United States, 334 F.2d 206, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 4806 (5th Cir. 1964).
334 F.2d 206 (Maurice J. Savoie, Lipton J. Vizier and Gerald M. Labruzzo v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Taking, killing, or possessing migratory birds unlawful
16 U.S.C. § 703