Maurice Hooker v. Arnold Verbeek
This text of Maurice Hooker v. Arnold Verbeek (Maurice Hooker v. Arnold Verbeek) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISMISS and Opinion Filed April 7, 2022
In the Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-00088-CV
MAURICE HOOKER, Appellant V. ARNOLD VERBEEK, Appellee
On Appeal from the 298th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-19-20523
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Carlyle, Smith, and Garcia Opinion by Justice Carlyle Before the Court is the parties’ joint motion to dismiss the appeal because they
have settled their dispute. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R.
APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(A).
/Cory L. Carlyle// CORY L. CARLYLE 220088f.p05 JUSTICE Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
MAURICE HOOKER, Appellant On Appeal from the 298th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas No. 05-22-00088-CV V. Trial Court Cause No. DC-19-20523. Opinion delivered by Justice Carlyle. ARNOLD VERBEEK, Appellee Justices Smith and Garcia participating.
In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.
Subject to any agreement between the parties, it is ORDERED that appellee ARNOLD VERBEEK recover his costs of this appeal from appellant MAURICE HOOKER.
Judgment entered this 7th day of April, 2022.
–2–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Maurice Hooker v. Arnold Verbeek, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maurice-hooker-v-arnold-verbeek-texapp-2022.