Maurice Holmes v. Damal African Hair, Damel Hairbraiding, Diop Deguene

Opinion

Opinion issued August 25, 2011.

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

————————————

NO. 01-10-00488-CV

———————————

MAURICE HOLMES, Appellant

V.

DAMAL AFRICAN HAIR, DAMEL HAIRBRAIDING, DIOP DEGUENE, Appellees

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 2

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 887529

MEMORANDUM OPINION

          Appellant, Maurice Holmes, has neither established indigence, nor paid all the required fees.  See Tex. R. App. P. 5 (requiring payment of fees in civil cases unless indigent), 20.1 (listing requirements for establishing indigence); see also Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. §§ 51.207, 51.941(a) (Vernon 2005), § 101.041 (Vernon Supp. 2010) (listing fees in court of appeals); Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 07-9138 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2007), reprinted in Tex. R. App. P. app. A § B(1) (listing fees in court of appeals).  After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond.  See Tex. R. App. P. 5 (allowing enforcement of rule); 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case).

          We dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees. 

          We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Higley, and Huddle.