Maurice A. Stills v. State of Florida

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 9, 2017
Docket17-1558
StatusPublished

This text of Maurice A. Stills v. State of Florida (Maurice A. Stills v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Maurice A. Stills v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

MAURICE A. STILLS, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Petitioner, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

v. CASE NO. 1D17-1558

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent. ___________________________/

Opinion filed August 10, 2017.

Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel -- Original Jurisdiction.

Maurice A. Stills, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is dismissed as

successive.

LEWIS, WETHERELL, and WINSOR, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Maurice A. Stills v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maurice-a-stills-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2017.