Maurice A. Rapoport v. E. Wilson Purdy

Fifth Circuit

Maurice A. Rapoport v. E. Wilson Purdy

488 F.2d 536, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 6555

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedDecember 11, 1973

Docket73-2892

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 488 F.2d 536 (Maurice A. Rapoport v. E. Wilson Purdy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Maurice A. Rapoport v. E. Wilson Purdy, 488 F.2d 536, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 6555 (5th Cir. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

488 F.2d 536

Maurice A. RAPOPORT, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
E. Wilson PURDY, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 73-2892 Summary Calendar.*

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

Dec. 11, 1973.

Maurice A. Rapoport, pro se.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen. of Fla., Tallahassee, Fla., Richard E. Gerstein, State's Atty., Miami, Fla., for respondent-appellee.

Before BROWN, Chief Judge, and DYER and SIMPSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The appeal is dismissed as frivolous. See Local Rule 20.

*

Rule 18, 5 Cir., Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of New York et al., 5 Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI