Maurice A. Krisel v. Rafael Duran, Sam J. Van Hining, and Economic Development Administration of Puerto Rico, and Phillips Petroleum Company

424 F.2d 1367, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 9125
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided May 20, 1970·No. 34091·Published

Opinion

424 F.2d 1367

Maurice A. KRISEL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Rafael DURAN, Sam J. Van Hining, and Economic Development
Administration of Puerto Rico, Defendants, and
Phillips Petroleum Company, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 621, Docket 34091.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Argued May 11, 1970.
Decided May 20, 1970.

Copal Mintz, Roman Beck, and Benjamin M. Cardozo, New York City (Cardozo & Cardozo, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff-appellant.

Robert MacCrate, and J. Marshall Wellborn, New York City (Sullivan & Cromwell, New York City, of counsel), for defendant-appellee.

Before FRIENDLY and KAUFMAN, Circuit Judges, and BRYAN, District judge.1

PER CURIAM:

We affirm for the reasons stated by Judge Weinfeld in his opinion below, 303 F.Supp. 573 (S.D.N.Y.1969).

1

Of the District Court for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Maurice A. Krisel v. Rafael Duran, Sam J. Van Hining, and Economic Development Administration of Puerto Rico, and Phillips Petroleum Company, 424 F.2d 1367, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 9125 (2d Cir. 1970).

424 F.2d 1367 (Maurice A. Krisel v. Rafael Duran, Sam J. Van Hining, and Economic Development Administration of Puerto Rico, and Phillips Petroleum Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Krisel v. Duran
303 F. Supp. 573 (S.D. New York, 1969)