Maurer v. Wolff

New York Supreme Court

Maurer v. Wolff

21 N.Y.S. 202, 50 N.Y. St. Rep. 634

DecidedDecember 12, 1892

StatusPublished

This text of 21 N.Y.S. 202 (Maurer v. Wolff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Maurer v. Wolff, 21 N.Y.S. 202, 50 N.Y. St. Rep. 634 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1892).

Pincite

Opinion

PRATT, J.

The testimony authorizes a finding that plaintiff had 30 days in which to determine^ whether the horse was satisfactory. Within that time the horse was returned to the vendor, who received it without objection so far as appears. This action is brought to recover back the price paid for the horse on the original purchase. No defense is pleaded except that the original sale was made on Sunday, which is clearly frivolous. If the sale was invalid, that affords no reason why defendant should be allowed to keep money belonging to his neighbor.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PRATT, J.

The testimony authorizes a finding that plaintiff had 30 days in which to determine^ whether the horse was satisfactory. Within that time the horse was returned to the vendor, who received it without objection so far as appears. This action is brought to recover back the price paid for the horse on the original purchase. No defense is pleaded except that the original sale was made on Sunday, which is clearly frivolous. If the sale was invalid, that affords no reason why defendant should be allowed to keep money belonging to his neighbor.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 N.Y.S. 202, 50 N.Y. St. Rep. 634, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maurer-v-wolff-nysupct-1892.