Maurer v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Maurer v. State

108 So. 925, 21 Ala. App. 685

Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided May 25, 1926·No. 8 Div. 493.·Published

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

The defendant was convicted by the jury under the second, count of the indictment, which charged .him with the offense of unlawfully possessing a still, to be used for the purpose of manufacturing prohibited 'liquors, etc. The court fixed the minimum term of imprisonment in the penitentiary, and defendant appealed. The appeal is upon the record only, as there is no bill of exceptions. No error is apparent on the record; therefore the judgment of conviction appealed from is affirmed. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, P. J.

The defendant was convicted by the jury under the second, count of the indictment, which charged .him with the offense of unlawfully possessing a still, to be used for the purpose of manufacturing prohibited 'liquors, etc. The court fixed the minimum term of imprisonment in the penitentiary, and defendant appealed. The appeal is upon the record only, as there is no bill of exceptions. No error is apparent on the record; therefore the judgment of conviction appealed from is affirmed. Affirmed.

Maurer v. State, 108 So. 925, 21 Ala. App. 685 (Ala. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

108 So. 925 (Maurer v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.