Maurer v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Maurer v. State

108 So. 925, 21 Ala. App. 685

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 25, 1926

Docket8 Div. 493.

StatusPublished

This text of 108 So. 925 (Maurer v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Maurer v. State, 108 So. 925, 21 Ala. App. 685 (Ala. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

The defendant was convicted by the jury under the second, count of the indictment, which charged .him with the offense of unlawfully possessing a still, to be used for the purpose of manufacturing prohibited 'liquors, etc. The court fixed the minimum term of imprisonment in the penitentiary, and defendant appealed. The appeal is upon the record only, as there is no bill of exceptions. No error is apparent on the record; therefore the judgment of conviction appealed from is affirmed. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, P. J.

The defendant was convicted by the jury under the second, count of the indictment, which charged .him with the offense of unlawfully possessing a still, to be used for the purpose of manufacturing prohibited 'liquors, etc. The court fixed the minimum term of imprisonment in the penitentiary, and defendant appealed. The appeal is upon the record only, as there is no bill of exceptions. No error is apparent on the record; therefore the judgment of conviction appealed from is affirmed. Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

108 So. 925, 21 Ala. App. 685, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maurer-v-state-alactapp-1926.