Maurer v. Peters

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Maurer v. Peters

242 A.D. 773

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 15, 1934·Published

Opinion

Order denying motion to dismiss application for a deficiency judgment affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opimon. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Seudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Julie McNamara, Appellant, v. Andrew McTigue and Others, Defendants, and Julius Levy, Respondent.— Order granting motion for the examination of plaintiff before trial affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements; examination to proceed on five days’ notice. No opimon. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Seudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying motion to dismiss application for a deficiency judgment affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opimon. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Seudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Julie McNamara, Appellant, v. Andrew McTigue and Others, Defendants, and Julius Levy, Respondent.— Order granting motion for the examination of plaintiff before trial affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements; examination to proceed on five days’ notice. No opimon. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Seudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Maurer v. Peters, 242 A.D. 773 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

242 A.D. 773 (Maurer v. Peters) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.