Maurer v. Peters

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Maurer v. Peters

242 A.D. 773

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 15, 1934

StatusPublished

This text of 242 A.D. 773 (Maurer v. Peters) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Maurer v. Peters, 242 A.D. 773 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

Order denying motion to dismiss application for a deficiency judgment affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opimon. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Seudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Julie McNamara, Appellant, v. Andrew McTigue and Others, Defendants, and Julius Levy, Respondent.— Order granting motion for the examination of plaintiff before trial affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements; examination to proceed on five days’ notice. No opimon. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Seudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying motion to dismiss application for a deficiency judgment affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opimon. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Seudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Julie McNamara, Appellant, v. Andrew McTigue and Others, Defendants, and Julius Levy, Respondent.— Order granting motion for the examination of plaintiff before trial affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements; examination to proceed on five days’ notice. No opimon. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Seudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

242 A.D. 773, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maurer-v-peters-nyappdiv-1934.