Maurer v. Maurer
This text of 836 So. 2d 8 (Maurer v. Maurer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Granted and Remanded to the district court for an evidentiary hearing.
The trial court signed an ex parte order requiring the child to be evaluated by Dr. Zimmerman in a joint session with her father. The mother opposes this order on grounds that it would be detrimental to the child. Because the mother was neither allowed to oppose nor prove her allegations that a joint evaluation session of the child with her father by Dr. Zimmerman would be detrimental to the child, the trial court abused its discretion. Accordingly, the trial court is ordered to conduct an evidentiary hearing to determine whether a joint evaluation of the child with her father by Dr. Zimmerman would be detrimental to the child under the circumstances of this case.
REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
836 So. 2d 8, 2002 La. LEXIS 3356, 2002 WL 31664637, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maurer-v-maurer-la-2002.