Maupin v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Maupin v. State

536 S.W.2d 507, 1976 Mo. App. LEXIS 2765

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 21, 1976

DocketNo. 10164

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 536 S.W.2d 507 (Maupin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Maupin v. State, 536 S.W.2d 507, 1976 Mo. App. LEXIS 2765 (Mo. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

BILLINGS, Chief Judge.

Appellant Maupin has appealed from a denial of his Rule 27.26, V.A.M.R., motion to vacate judgment and sentence.

This appeal is a companion case to Gibson v. State, decided this date, and since the appellant has pending in this Court a direct appeal from the conviction he seeks to attack under Rule 27.26 he cannot invoke post-conviction remedies until his appeal is determined. Rule 27.26(b), (2).

For the reasons set forth in Gibson v. State, the state’s motion to dismiss this appeal is sustained and the appeal is dismissed.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI