Mauna Kea Technologies v. Anticancer, Inc.
This text of Mauna Kea Technologies v. Anticancer, Inc. (Mauna Kea Technologies v. Anticancer, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
MAUNA KEA TECHNOLOGIES, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
ANTICANCER, INC., Defendant-Appellee. ______________________
2014-1412 ______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California in No. 3:11-cv-01407-CAB- JMA, Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
JEFFREY M. GOEHRING, Young & Thompson, of Alex- andria, Virginia, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was DOUGLAS V. RIGLER.
MATT VALENTI, AntiCancer, Inc., of San Diego, Cali- fornia, argued for defendant-appellee. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (MOORE, REYNA, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
December 10, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Mauna Kea Technologies v. Anticancer, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mauna-kea-technologies-v-anticancer-inc-cafc-2014.