Mauna Kea Technologies v. Anticancer, Inc.

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedDecember 10, 2014
Docket14-1412
StatusUnpublished

This text of Mauna Kea Technologies v. Anticancer, Inc. (Mauna Kea Technologies v. Anticancer, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mauna Kea Technologies v. Anticancer, Inc., (Fed. Cir. 2014).

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

MAUNA KEA TECHNOLOGIES, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

ANTICANCER, INC., Defendant-Appellee. ______________________

2014-1412 ______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California in No. 3:11-cv-01407-CAB- JMA, Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

JEFFREY M. GOEHRING, Young & Thompson, of Alex- andria, Virginia, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was DOUGLAS V. RIGLER.

MATT VALENTI, AntiCancer, Inc., of San Diego, Cali- fornia, argued for defendant-appellee. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (MOORE, REYNA, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

December 10, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Mauna Kea Technologies v. Anticancer, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mauna-kea-technologies-v-anticancer-inc-cafc-2014.