Maulucci v. Enney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Maulucci v. Enney

7 A.D.2d 615, 178 N.Y.S.2d 673, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4583

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 17, 1958

StatusPublished

This text of 7 A.D.2d 615 (Maulucci v. Enney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Maulucci v. Enney, 7 A.D.2d 615, 178 N.Y.S.2d 673, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4583 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment and order reversed on the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, unless the plaintiff shall, within 10 days, stipulate to reduce the verdict to the sum of $8,500, as of the date of the rendition thereof, in which event the judgment is modified accordingly and, as so modified is, together with the order, affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Memorandum: On the present record it is our opinion that the verdict of the jury was excessive. All concur. (Appeal from a judgment of Erie Trial Term for plaintiff in an automobile negligence action. The order denied a motion for a new trial.) Present — MeCurn, P. J., Kimball, Williams and Bastow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order reversed on the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, unless the plaintiff shall, within 10 days, stipulate to reduce the verdict to the sum of $8,500, as of the date of the rendition thereof, in which event the judgment is modified accordingly and, as so modified is, together with the order, affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Memorandum: On the present record it is our opinion that the verdict of the jury was excessive. All concur. (Appeal from a judgment of Erie Trial Term for plaintiff in an automobile negligence action. The order denied a motion for a new trial.) Present — MeCurn, P. J., Kimball, Williams and Bastow, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 A.D.2d 615, 178 N.Y.S.2d 673, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4583, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maulucci-v-enney-nyappdiv-1958.