Maultsby v. Maultsby

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Maultsby v. Maultsby

109 So. 2d 202

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 30, 1959·No. No. 799·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant primarily questions the alimony award. It is not made to appear that there has been an abuse of judicial discretion. If it should develop that the alimony award imposes a hardship upon the appellant, then he has his remedy, under appropriate circumstances, for reduction as provided under section 65.15, Florida Statutes, F.S.A. See also Lewis v. Lewis, Fla.App.1958, 104 So.2d 597. No error has been made to appear. The cause is accordingly affirmed.

Affirmed.

KANNER, C. J., and ALLEN and SHANNON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant primarily questions the alimony award. It is not made to appear that there has been an abuse of judicial discretion. If it should develop that the alimony award imposes a hardship upon the appellant, then he has his remedy, under appropriate circumstances, for reduction as provided under section 65.15, Florida Statutes, F.S.A. See also Lewis v. Lewis, Fla.App.1958, 104 So.2d 597. No error has been made to appear. The cause is accordingly affirmed.

Affirmed.

KANNER, C. J., and ALLEN and SHANNON, JJ., concur.

Maultsby v. Maultsby, 109 So. 2d 202 (Fla. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

109 So. 2d 202 (Maultsby v. Maultsby) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related