Maultsby v. Maultsby

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Maultsby v. Maultsby

109 So. 2d 202

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 30, 1959

DocketNo. 799

StatusPublished

This text of 109 So. 2d 202 (Maultsby v. Maultsby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Maultsby v. Maultsby, 109 So. 2d 202 (Fla. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant primarily questions the alimony award. It is not made to appear that there has been an abuse of judicial discretion. If it should develop that the alimony award imposes a hardship upon the appellant, then he has his remedy, under appropriate circumstances, for reduction as provided under section 65.15, Florida Statutes, F.S.A. See also Lewis v. Lewis, Fla.App.1958, 104 So.2d 597. No error has been made to appear. The cause is accordingly affirmed.

Affirmed.

KANNER, C. J., and ALLEN and SHANNON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant primarily questions the alimony award. It is not made to appear that there has been an abuse of judicial discretion. If it should develop that the alimony award imposes a hardship upon the appellant, then he has his remedy, under appropriate circumstances, for reduction as provided under section 65.15, Florida Statutes, F.S.A. See also Lewis v. Lewis, Fla.App.1958, 104 So.2d 597. No error has been made to appear. The cause is accordingly affirmed.

Affirmed.

KANNER, C. J., and ALLEN and SHANNON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

109 So. 2d 202, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maultsby-v-maultsby-fladistctapp-1959.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack