Maull v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Maull v. State

37 Ala. 160

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedJanuary 15, 1861

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 37 Ala. 160 (Maull v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Maull v. State, 37 Ala. 160 (Ala. 1861).

Pincite

Opinion

A. J. WALKER, C. J.

The offenses charged tp have been committed by the defendants, do not appear from the indictment to have been perpetrated by any joint act; but, for aught disclosed, may have been altogether distinct, neither defendant participating in the criminal act of the other. For this reason, tbe indictment was demurrable for duplicity. — Shaw v. State, 18 Ala. 547.

The judgment of the court below is reversed, and the cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

A. J. WALKER, C. J.

The offenses charged tp have been committed by the defendants, do not appear from the indictment to have been perpetrated by any joint act; but, for aught disclosed, may have been altogether distinct, neither defendant participating in the criminal act of the other. For this reason, tbe indictment was demurrable for duplicity. — Shaw v. State, 18 Ala. 547.

The judgment of the court below is reversed, and the cause remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

37 Ala. 160, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maull-v-state-ala-1861.

Opinion

A. J. WALKER, C. J.

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack