Maull v. State
37 Ala. 160
Opinion
A. J. WALKER, C. J.
The offenses charged tp have been committed by the defendants, do not appear from the indictment to have been perpetrated by any joint act; but, for aught disclosed, may have been altogether distinct, neither defendant participating in the criminal act of the other. For this reason, tbe indictment was demurrable for duplicity. — Shaw v. State, 18 Ala. 547.
The judgment of the court below is reversed, and the cause remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Maull v. State, 37 Ala. 160 (Ala. 1861).
37 Ala. 160 (Maull v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Durston and Fleming v. State
200 S.W. 524 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1918)
Allen v. State
74 Ala. 557 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1883)