Maulella v. Maulella
This text of 279 A.D.2d 615 (Maulella v. Maulella) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by a judgment dated July 16, 1986, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Falanga, J.), dated February 9, 2000, as denied his motion to terminate his maintenance obligation, and imposed a sanction upon his attorney.
Ordered that the appeal from so much of the order as imposed a sanction upon the plaintiffs attorney is dismissed, as the plaintiff is not aggrieved thereby (see, CPLR 5511; Rodriguez v Pontillo, 278 AD2d 400); and it is further,
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as reviewed; and it is further,
Ordered that the respondent is awarded one bill of costs.
The Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiffs motion to terminate his maintenance obligation, as he failed to demonstrate a change of circumstances that would warrant such relief (see, Flapper v Flapper, 204 AD2d 518, 519). Ritter, J. P., S. Miller, Friedmann and Smith, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
279 A.D.2d 615, 719 N.Y.S.2d 884, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 944, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maulella-v-maulella-nyappdiv-2001.