Maule Industries, Inc. v. Everglades Development Corporation and Thirteen Collins Corporation

Fifth Circuit

Maule Industries, Inc. v. Everglades Development Corporation and Thirteen Collins Corporation

395 F.2d 223, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 6841

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedMay 21, 1968

Docket25057_1

StatusPublished

This text of 395 F.2d 223 (Maule Industries, Inc. v. Everglades Development Corporation and Thirteen Collins Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Maule Industries, Inc. v. Everglades Development Corporation and Thirteen Collins Corporation, 395 F.2d 223, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 6841 (5th Cir. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This appeal attacks the order of the trial court in dismissing this Section 10 reorganization proceeding in Bankruptcy upon its finding that it was unreasonable to expect that a plan of reorganization could be effected, Section 146(3) Bankruptcy Act. The determination by the trial court was one of fact and it may not be set aside unless clearly erroneous, York v. Fla. Southern Corporation, 5 Cir., 310 F.2d 109. There being ample basis for the factual determination by the trial court, we conclude that the judgment should be, and it is,

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

This appeal attacks the order of the trial court in dismissing this Section 10 reorganization proceeding in Bankruptcy upon its finding that it was unreasonable to expect that a plan of reorganization could be effected, Section 146(3) Bankruptcy Act. The determination by the trial court was one of fact and it may not be set aside unless clearly erroneous, York v. Fla. Southern Corporation, 5 Cir., 310 F.2d 109. There being ample basis for the factual determination by the trial court, we conclude that the judgment should be, and it is,

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

395 F.2d 223, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 6841, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maule-industries-inc-v-everglades-development-corporation-and-thirteen-ca5-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack