Maulding v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Maulding v. State

727 S.W.2d 855, 292 Ark. 102, 1987 Ark. LEXIS 2062

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedApril 27, 1987

DocketCR 87-54

StatusPublished

This text of 727 S.W.2d 855 (Maulding v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Maulding v. State, 727 S.W.2d 855, 292 Ark. 102, 1987 Ark. LEXIS 2062 (Ark. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This motion to proceed in forma pauperis is accompanied by appellant’s affidavit pursuant to Rule 28 of the Rules of the Supreme Court and the Court of Appeals. The affidavit, dated March 2, 1987, reflects no assets or income. However, a partial record filed in connection with the appeal contains an order of the trial court dated March 5,1987 reciting that a hearing was held on February 27,1987 on appellant’s oral motion to proceed in forma pauperis and was denied upon a finding that the appellant is not indigent and has funds available to him. Appellant’s motion in this court makes no reference to the order of the trial court, nor presents any record or argument demonstrating where the trial court was wrong. Puckett v. Puckett, 289 Ark. 67, 709 S.W.2d 82 (1986). Accordingly, the motion is denied.

Purtle, J., and Newbern, J., would grant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This motion to proceed in forma pauperis is accompanied by appellant’s affidavit pursuant to Rule 28 of the Rules of the Supreme Court and the Court of Appeals. The affidavit, dated March 2, 1987, reflects no assets or income. However, a partial record filed in connection with the appeal contains an order of the trial court dated March 5,1987 reciting that a hearing was held on February 27,1987 on appellant’s oral motion to proceed in forma pauperis and was denied upon a finding that the appellant is not indigent and has funds available to him. Appellant’s motion in this court makes no reference to the order of the trial court, nor presents any record or argument demonstrating where the trial court was wrong. Puckett v. Puckett, 289 Ark. 67, 709 S.W.2d 82 (1986). Accordingly, the motion is denied.

Purtle, J., and Newbern, J., would grant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

727 S.W.2d 855, 292 Ark. 102, 1987 Ark. LEXIS 2062, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maulding-v-state-ark-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack