Maulding v. Adams

Oregon Supreme Court

Maulding v. Adams

410 P.2d 1023, 242 Or. 616, 1966 Ore. LEXIS 632

DecidedFebruary 16, 1966

StatusPublished

This text of 410 P.2d 1023 (Maulding v. Adams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Maulding v. Adams, 410 P.2d 1023, 242 Or. 616, 1966 Ore. LEXIS 632 (Or. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment in favor of defendants in an action for damages for misrepresentation in the sale of a house and lot. The cause was [617]*617tried by the court without a jury and the court found that the alleged misrepresentations had not been made.

Our examination of the record found evidence to support the trial court’s findings. The question was one of fact.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment in favor of defendants in an action for damages for misrepresentation in the sale of a house and lot. The cause was [617]*617tried by the court without a jury and the court found that the alleged misrepresentations had not been made.

Our examination of the record found evidence to support the trial court’s findings. The question was one of fact.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

410 P.2d 1023, 242 Or. 616, 1966 Ore. LEXIS 632, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maulding-v-adams-or-1966.