Mauldin v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Mauldin v. State

128 S.W.3d 827, 354 Ark. 721, 2003 Ark. LEXIS 595

Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided November 13, 2003·No. CR 03-1197·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant, James Ricky Mauldin, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion for rule on clerk. Attorney, Frank E. Shaw, states in the motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by an attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

The motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Appellant, James Ricky Mauldin, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion for rule on clerk. Attorney, Frank E. Shaw, states in the motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by an attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

The motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Mauldin v. State, 128 S.W.3d 827, 354 Ark. 721, 2003 Ark. LEXIS 595 (Ark. 2003).

Pincite

128 S.W.3d 827 (Mauldin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.