Mauldin v. Johns

Fourth Circuit

Mauldin v. Johns

234 F. App'x 122

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 20, 2007·No. No. 07-6199·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Alfred Lee Mauldin, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Mauldin v. Stansberry, No. 5:06-hc-02023-D (E.D.N.C. filed Feb. 1, 2007; entered Feb. 2, 2007). We deny Mauldin’s motions to remand, for appointment of counsel, and to consolidate this appeal with No. 07-6643. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Alfred Lee Mauldin, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Mauldin v. Stansberry, No. 5:06-hc-02023-D (E.D.N.C. filed Feb. 1, 2007; entered Feb. 2, 2007). We deny Mauldin’s motions to remand, for appointment of counsel, and to consolidate this appeal with No. 07-6643. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Mauldin v. Johns, 234 F. App'x 122 (4th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

234 F. App'x 122 (Mauldin v. Johns) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related