Mauldin v. Crider

123 S.W.2d 472
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 21, 1938
DocketNo. 8747.
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 123 S.W.2d 472 (Mauldin v. Crider) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mauldin v. Crider, 123 S.W.2d 472 (Tex. Ct. App. 1938).

Opinion

McClendon, chief justice.

This is a boundary suit brought in form in trespass to try title by Crider (appel-lee)- against Mauldin and other appellants. Other defendants not appealing need not be noted. The real controversy revolver around the location of N. line of the Newman and Williamson (Sylvester Tract), the E. line of the J. M. Holden 160-acre tract, and the E. line of the L. M. Sharp *473 207.5-acre tract, and the E. Stribling 200-acre homestead tract, all subdivisions of the Gilbert League in Blanco County. The following map of the E. portion of the Gilbert league will facilitate a clear understanding of the points of contention. The W. portion of the league is omitted since it is not involved in the controversy.

According to its patent calls the league is 5099 varas square. The S. E. corner is not in' dispute. The only witness testifying to the location of the N. E. corner placed it 5310 varas N. of the S. E. corner, thus giving the E. line an excess of 211 varas. In 1888 the admittedly then owners of the league partitioned it *474 among themselves by an agreed judgment, which first divided the league into two parts, one of which, consisting of 960 acres, was set apart to the defendants Robinson, Pryor, and Newton; the remainder being set apart to plaintiffs. The .decree then proceeded to partition the latter portion among the several plaintiffs. The tract set apart to plaintiffs called to begin at the S. W. corner of the league; thence N. 5099 v. to its N. W. cor. (bearings given); thence E. 3199 v. stake in N. B. L.; thence S. 2850 v. stake; thence E. 1900 v. to stake in E. B. L.; thence ,S. with said line 2249 v. to S. E. cor. (bearings given); thence W. 5099 v. to beginning. The 960.acres called to begin at the N. E. cor. of the league; thence W. with the N. B. L. 1900 v. to stake in said line; thence S. 2850 v. to stake; thence E. 1900 v. to stake in E. B. L.; thence N. with said line 2850 v. to beginning. .Out of the plaintiffs’ portion four tracts were set apart . in severalty which will be noted, the others being unimportant. These four were the Gilbert and Morrow (G. & M.) 160 acres; the T. M. Miller 1142 acres; the Joana House 50 acres; and the Newman and Williamson (Sylvester tract) -500 acres. The G. & M. 160 a. called to begin in the N. B. L. of the league 1900 v. W. from its N. E. cor.; thence S. 1186 v.; thence W. 768 v.; thence N. 1186 v. to N. B. L.; thence E. with said line to beginning. The Miller 1142 acres called to begin at the S. E. cor. of the G. & M. 160 a.; thence S. 1596 v.; thence E. 518.5 v.; thence S. 2249 v. to S. B. L.; thence W. 950 v.; thence N. 1181 v.; thence E. 85 v.; thence N. 1357 v.; thence E. 1657 v. to beg. The House 50 a. called to beg. on the E. B. L. of the league at the S. E. cor. of the 960 acres; thence S. with said E. B. L. 531 v.; thence W. 531 v.; thence N. 531 v.; thence E. 531 v. to beg. No calls for lines, corners, or natural objects, other than as stated, are given in the field notes of these tracts.

*473

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Earnest Taylor v. Vernice Hill
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2004

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
123 S.W.2d 472, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mauldin-v-crider-texapp-1938.