Mauldin v. Cairo Motor Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Mauldin v. Cairo Motor Co.

126 S.E. 292, 159 Ga. 558, 1925 Ga. LEXIS 21

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided January 15, 1925·No. No. 4603·Published

Opinion

This case being for decision by the entire court of six Justices, who are evenly divided in opinion, Beck, P. J., and Gilbert and Hines, JJ., being of the opinion that the judge did not err in overruling the motion for new trial, and Russell, G. J., and Atkinson and Hill, JJ., being of [559]*559the opinion that the court erred in not granting a new trial, the judgment stands affirmed hy operation of law.

No. 4603. January 15, 1925. W. H. Duckworth, for plaintiffs in error. Jeff A. Pope, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This case being for decision by the entire court of six Justices, who are evenly divided in opinion, Beck, P. J., and Gilbert and Hines, JJ., being of the opinion that the judge did not err in overruling the motion for new trial, and Russell, G. J., and Atkinson and Hill, JJ., being of [559]*559the opinion that the court erred in not granting a new trial, the judgment stands affirmed hy operation of law.

No. 4603. January 15, 1925. W. H. Duckworth, for plaintiffs in error. Jeff A. Pope, contra.

Mauldin v. Cairo Motor Co., 126 S.E. 292, 159 Ga. 558, 1925 Ga. LEXIS 21 (Ga. 1925).

Pincite

126 S.E. 292 (Mauldin v. Cairo Motor Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.