Mauldin v. Cairo Motor Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Mauldin v. Cairo Motor Co.

126 S.E. 292, 159 Ga. 558, 1925 Ga. LEXIS 21

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 15, 1925

DocketNo. 4603

StatusPublished

This text of 126 S.E. 292 (Mauldin v. Cairo Motor Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mauldin v. Cairo Motor Co., 126 S.E. 292, 159 Ga. 558, 1925 Ga. LEXIS 21 (Ga. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

This case being for decision by the entire court of six Justices, who are evenly divided in opinion, Beck, P. J., and Gilbert and Hines, JJ., being of the opinion that the judge did not err in overruling the motion for new trial, and Russell, G. J., and Atkinson and Hill, JJ., being of [559]*559the opinion that the court erred in not granting a new trial, the judgment stands affirmed hy operation of law.

No. 4603. January 15, 1925. W. H. Duckworth, for plaintiffs in error. Jeff A. Pope, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This case being for decision by the entire court of six Justices, who are evenly divided in opinion, Beck, P. J., and Gilbert and Hines, JJ., being of the opinion that the judge did not err in overruling the motion for new trial, and Russell, G. J., and Atkinson and Hill, JJ., being of [559]*559the opinion that the court erred in not granting a new trial, the judgment stands affirmed hy operation of law.

No. 4603. January 15, 1925. W. H. Duckworth, for plaintiffs in error. Jeff A. Pope, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

126 S.E. 292, 159 Ga. 558, 1925 Ga. LEXIS 21, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mauldin-v-cairo-motor-co-ga-1925.