Maulden v. State

97 So. 787, 19 Ala. App. 296, 1923 Ala. App. LEXIS 152
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided May 8, 1923·No. 4 Div. 800.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

FOSTER, J.

The evidence in this ease and the questions reserved are the same as in the case of Ira H. Henderson v. State, 97 South. 785, 1 with the following exception: In, the instant case the defendant offered to show that he dipped his cattle at the Grider vat, and the undisputed evidence showed that the Grider vat was not a government vat and was not under government supervision. Affirmed on authority of Ira H. Henderson v. State.

Affirmed.

On Rehearing.

Application for rehearing overruled on the authority of Ira H. Henderson v. State, ante, p. 294, 97 South. 785.

Application overruled.

1

Ante, p. 294.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Maulden v. State, 97 So. 787, 19 Ala. App. 296, 1923 Ala. App. LEXIS 152 (Ala. Ct. App. 1923).

97 So. 787 (Maulden v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ex Parte Maulden
97 So. 788 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1923)