Maulden v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Maulden v. State

97 So. 787, 19 Ala. App. 296, 1923 Ala. App. LEXIS 152

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 8, 1923

Docket4 Div. 800.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 97 So. 787 (Maulden v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Maulden v. State, 97 So. 787, 19 Ala. App. 296, 1923 Ala. App. LEXIS 152 (Ala. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

FOSTER, J.

The evidence in this ease and the questions reserved are the same as in the case of Ira H. Henderson v. State, 97 South. 785, 1 with the following exception: In, the instant case the defendant offered to show that he dipped his cattle at the Grider vat, and the undisputed evidence showed that the Grider vat was not a government vat and was not under government supervision. Affirmed on authority of Ira H. Henderson v. State.

Affirmed.

On Rehearing.

Application for rehearing overruled on the authority of Ira H. Henderson v. State, ante, p. 294, 97 South. 785.

Application overruled.

1

Ante, p. 294.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI