Maul v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Maul v. State

477 S.W.3d 708, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1295, 2015 WL 8799558

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 15, 2015

DocketNo. ED 102677

StatusPublished

This text of 477 S.W.3d 708 (Maul v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Maul v. State, 477 S.W.3d 708, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1295, 2015 WL 8799558 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Donald A. Maul appeals from the motion court’s denial of his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 24.035¹ without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we find the motion court did not clearly err in denying Mov-ant’s motion without an evidentiary hearing. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b) (2015).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Donald A. Maul appeals from the motion court’s denial of his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 24.035¹ without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we find the motion court did not clearly err in denying Mov-ant’s motion without an evidentiary hearing. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b) (2015).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

477 S.W.3d 708, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1295, 2015 WL 8799558, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maul-v-state-moctapp-2015.