Maul v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Maul v. State

477 S.W.3d 708, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1295, 2015 WL 8799558

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 15, 2015·No. No. ED 102677·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Donald A. Maul appeals from the motion court’s denial of his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 24.035¹ without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we find the motion court did not clearly err in denying Mov-ant’s motion without an evidentiary hearing. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b) (2015).

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Donald A. Maul appeals from the motion court’s denial of his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 24.035¹ without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we find the motion court did not clearly err in denying Mov-ant’s motion without an evidentiary hearing. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b) (2015).

Footnotes

Maul v. State, 477 S.W.3d 708, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1295, 2015 WL 8799558 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

477 S.W.3d 708 (Maul v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.