Home/Supreme Court of Florida/Mauk v. State of Florida

Mauk v. State of Florida

145 So. 887, 108 Fla. 439
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedFebruary 17, 1933
StatusPublished
Cited by36 cases

This text of 145 So. 887 (Mauk v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mauk v. State of Florida, 145 So. 887, 108 Fla. 439 (Fla. 1933).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff in error was indicted in the Circuit Court of Hernando County under an indictment in two. counts. At the trial the State elected to stand on the first count of the indictment. That count of the indictment appears to have been drawn under the provisions of section 5143 R. G. S., 7244 C. G. L.

The evidence fails to establish the essential element of an offense under this statute, to-wit: that the defendant was a bailee for hire. Therefore, the judgment must be reversed on authority of Tounsend v. State, 63 Fla. 46, 57 Sou. 611. It is so ordered.

Reversed.

Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Brown, J., concurs in the result.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Western Cas. and Sur. Co. v. Honeywell, Inc.
380 So. 2d 1385 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1980)
Brander v. Nabors
443 F. Supp. 764 (N.D. Mississippi, 1978)
Standard Life Insurance v. Hinton
157 So. 2d 486 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1963)
Moody v. New York Life Insurance
161 F. Supp. 482 (S.D. Mississippi, 1958)
Myles v. National Life & Accident Insurance
77 So. 2d 815 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1955)
Franklin Like Ins. v. Stribling
62 So. 2d 563 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1953)
Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n v. Winter
46 So. 2d 803 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1950)
Cox v. Lamar Life Insurance
43 So. 2d 884 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1950)
World Fire & Marine Ins. v. King
191 So. 665 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1939)
Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Lindsey
185 So. 573 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1939)
Columbian Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Eaves
185 So. 557 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1939)
Bott v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States
78 P.2d 860 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1938)
Berry v. Acacia Mutual Life Assn.
67 P.2d 478 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1937)
Hickman v. Pan-American Life Ins. Co.
173 So. 742 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1937)
Cohen v. New York Life Insurance
29 Pa. D. & C. 383 (Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas, 1936)
Reingold v. New York Life Ins.
85 F.2d 776 (Ninth Circuit, 1936)
Lyford v. New England Mutual Life Insurance
184 A. 469 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1936)
&198tna Life Ins. Co. v. Roberts
164 So. 311 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1935)
State Life Ins. Co. of Indianapolis Ind. v. Parks
89 S.W.2d 289 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1935)
State Life Ins. Co. of Indianapolis v. Parry
88 S.W.2d 763 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
145 So. 887, 108 Fla. 439, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mauk-v-state-of-florida-fla-1933.