Mauk Seattle Lumber Co. v. Alcan Pacific Co.

Ninth Circuit

Mauk Seattle Lumber Co. v. Alcan Pacific Co.

414 F.2d 832, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 12537

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedMay 5, 1969

DocketNos. 21532, 21532-A

StatusPublished

This text of 414 F.2d 832 (Mauk Seattle Lumber Co. v. Alcan Pacific Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mauk Seattle Lumber Co. v. Alcan Pacific Co., 414 F.2d 832, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 12537 (9th Cir. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

On July 22, 1966, Judge Raymond E. Plummer, of the District of Alaska, filed his Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law in Alcan Pacific Co., Plaintiff, vs. Mauk Seattle Lumber Co., Defendants. On November 22, 1966, the District Judge filed his' Order Supplementing Findings of Fact and his Judgment.

Reviewing the entire record on appeal, we are satisfied that the Findings of the trial court are substantially supported by the evidence and are not “clearly erroneous”'.

On the basis of the Findings of Fact, Supplemental Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order of the District Judge, 302 F.Supp. 606, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

On July 22, 1966, Judge Raymond E. Plummer, of the District of Alaska, filed his Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law in Alcan Pacific Co., Plaintiff, vs. Mauk Seattle Lumber Co., Defendants. On November 22, 1966, the District Judge filed his' Order Supplementing Findings of Fact and his Judgment.

Reviewing the entire record on appeal, we are satisfied that the Findings of the trial court are substantially supported by the evidence and are not “clearly erroneous”'.

On the basis of the Findings of Fact, Supplemental Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order of the District Judge, 302 F.Supp. 606, the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

414 F.2d 832, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 12537, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mauk-seattle-lumber-co-v-alcan-pacific-co-ca9-1969.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack