Mauk Seattle Lumber Co. v. Alcan Pacific Co.

Ninth Circuit

Mauk Seattle Lumber Co. v. Alcan Pacific Co.

414 F.2d 832, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 12537

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided May 5, 1969·No. Nos. 21532, 21532-A·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

On July 22, 1966, Judge Raymond E. Plummer, of the District of Alaska, filed his Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law in Alcan Pacific Co., Plaintiff, vs. Mauk Seattle Lumber Co., Defendants. On November 22, 1966, the District Judge filed his' Order Supplementing Findings of Fact and his Judgment.

Reviewing the entire record on appeal, we are satisfied that the Findings of the trial court are substantially supported by the evidence and are not “clearly erroneous”'.

On the basis of the Findings of Fact, Supplemental Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order of the District Judge, 302 F.Supp. 606, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

On July 22, 1966, Judge Raymond E. Plummer, of the District of Alaska, filed his Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law in Alcan Pacific Co., Plaintiff, vs. Mauk Seattle Lumber Co., Defendants. On November 22, 1966, the District Judge filed his' Order Supplementing Findings of Fact and his Judgment.

Reviewing the entire record on appeal, we are satisfied that the Findings of the trial court are substantially supported by the evidence and are not “clearly erroneous”'.

On the basis of the Findings of Fact, Supplemental Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order of the District Judge, 302 F.Supp. 606, the judgment is affirmed.

Mauk Seattle Lumber Co. v. Alcan Pacific Co., 414 F.2d 832, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 12537 (9th Cir. 1969).

Pincite

414 F.2d 832 (Mauk Seattle Lumber Co. v. Alcan Pacific Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related