Mauk Seattle Lumber Co. v. Alcan Pacific Co., Alcan Pacific Co. v. Mauk Seattle Lumber Co.
This text of 414 F.2d 832 (Mauk Seattle Lumber Co. v. Alcan Pacific Co., Alcan Pacific Co. v. Mauk Seattle Lumber Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
414 F.2d 832
MAUK SEATTLE LUMBER CO., Appellant,
v.
ALCAN PACIFIC CO., Appellee.
ALCAN PACIFIC CO., Appellant,
v.
MAUK SEATTLE LUMBER CO., Appellee.
Nos. 21532, 21532-A.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
May 5, 1969.
John Kovarik (argued), of Casey & Pruzan, Seattle, Wash., Collins & Clasby, Fairbanks, Alaska, for appellant.
Charles E. Cole (argued), Fairbanks, Alaska, for appellee.
Before JERTBERG and MERRILL, Circuit Judges, and FOLEY, District judge.1
PER CURIAM:
On July 22, 1966, Judge Raymond E. Plummer, of the District of Alaska, filed his Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law in Alcan Pacific Co., Plaintiff, vs. Mauk Seattle Lumber Co., Defendants. On November 22, 1966, the District Judge filed his Order Supplementing Findings of Fact and his Judgment.
Reviewing the entire record on appeal, we are satisfied that the Findings of the trial court are substantially supported by the evidence and are not 'clearly erroneous'.
On the basis of the Findings of Fact, Supplemental Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order of the District Judge, 302 F.Supp. 606, the judgment is affirmed.
Honorable Roger D. Foley, District of Nevada, sitting by designation
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
414 F.2d 832, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mauk-seattle-lumber-co-v-alcan-pacific-co-alcan-pacific-co-v-mauk-ca9-1969.