Maugia v. State

236 S.W. 740, 90 Tex. Crim. 539, 1922 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 23
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided January 11, 1922·No. No. 6529.·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The appeal is from a judgment convicting the appellant of the offense of burglary.

The Assistant Attorney General suggests the escape of appellant, attaching the affidavit of the sheriff of Coleman County to the effect that the appellant escaped from jail on the 20th day of December last and was recaptured on the following day. This escape ousted this court of jurisdiction of his appeal. Code of Crim. Proc., Art. 912. Jurisdiction is not restored by his recapture. Lunsford v. State, 10 Texas Crim. App., 118; Ex parte Wood, 19 Texas Crim. App., 46; Loyd v. State, 19 Texas Crim. App., 137.

The appeal is dismissed.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Maugia v. State, 236 S.W. 740, 90 Tex. Crim. 539, 1922 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 23 (Tex. 1922).

236 S.W. 740 (Maugia v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Holliday v. State
482 S.W.2d 215 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1972)
Williams v. State
29 S.W.2d 388 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1930)
Gribble v. State
29 S.W.2d 391 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1930)
Mitchell v. State
265 S.W. 700 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1924)
Harris v. State
249 S.W. 1053 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1923)