Mauger v. Crosby

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Mauger v. Crosby

117 Mass. 330, 1875 Mass. LEXIS 230

CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

DecidedMarch 24, 1875

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 117 Mass. 330 (Mauger v. Crosby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mauger v. Crosby, 117 Mass. 330, 1875 Mass. LEXIS 230 (Mass. 1875).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court.

Independently of the two letters admitted under objection, there was evidence from which it would have been competent for the jury to find that the plaintiff accepted the proposition of Crosby & Co., as stated in their letter inclosing the notes in suit; and that he sent the machine to them in accordance therewith. If so, the transaction was complete, and the plaintiff became entitled to hold and collect the notes. By the terms of the report there must therefore be

' Judgment for the ‘¡plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court.

Independently of the two letters admitted under objection, there was evidence from which it would have been competent for the jury to find that the plaintiff accepted the proposition of Crosby & Co., as stated in their letter inclosing the notes in suit; and that he sent the machine to them in accordance therewith. If so, the transaction was complete, and the plaintiff became entitled to hold and collect the notes. By the terms of the report there must therefore be

' Judgment for the ‘¡plaintiff.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

117 Mass. 330, 1875 Mass. LEXIS 230, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mauger-v-crosby-mass-1875.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack