Maucher v. Hartzheim

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Maucher v. Hartzheim

121 A.D. 588, 106 N.Y.S. 371, 1907 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1851

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 23, 1907

StatusPublished

This text of 121 A.D. 588 (Maucher v. Hartzheim) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Maucher v. Hartzheim, 121 A.D. 588, 106 N.Y.S. 371, 1907 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1851 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1907).

Pincite

Opinion

Gaynor, J.:

The plaintiff made a requisition on the. defendant, who is the clerk .of Kings county, for a search against “Catherine Joyce, wife of Edward Joyce”, and this action is against' the said clerk for damages for negligence in omitting from his return a judgment against Cassie Joyce. . “ Cassie ” is said to be a diminution of Catherine, like Katie, but if.it be it is not gpnerally known or used as such, We are referred to no authority which would, sustain. the conclusion that the' omission of'the judgment was negligence.

The. judgment is affirmed.

Hirschberg P. J., Woodward, Rich and Miller, JJ., concurred.

Judgment of the Municipal-Court affirmed^ with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gaynor, J.:

The plaintiff made a requisition on the. defendant, who is the clerk .of Kings county, for a search against “Catherine Joyce, wife of Edward Joyce”, and this action is against' the said clerk for damages for negligence in omitting from his return a judgment against Cassie Joyce. . “ Cassie ” is said to be a diminution of Catherine, like Katie, but if.it be it is not gpnerally known or used as such, We are referred to no authority which would, sustain. the conclusion that the' omission of'the judgment was negligence.

The. judgment is affirmed.

Hirschberg P. J., Woodward, Rich and Miller, JJ., concurred.

Judgment of the Municipal-Court affirmed^ with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

121 A.D. 588, 106 N.Y.S. 371, 1907 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1851, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maucher-v-hartzheim-nyappdiv-1907.